According to Sam Hartman:
> However I think it is generally a good idea to talk to a maintainer
> before depending on unpublished internal interfaces of their package
> that have been known to change frequently.
I packaged nfs-utils, but had little to do with the coding. I assumed
that the upstre
> "Chip" == Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chip> According to Sam Hartman:
>> However I think it is generally a good idea to talk to a
>> maintainer before depending on unpublished internal interfaces
>> of their package that have been known to change frequently.
retitle 298920 [not-before-sarge] please make libkrb53 priority 'standard',
since nfs-utils depends on it
thanks
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:50:35PM -0500, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> The current unstable nfs-utils (1.0.7-1) builds nfs-common to depend
> on libkrb53 for NFSv4 support. Since nfs-comm
reassign 298920 libkrb53
thanks
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:47:57PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:50:35PM -0500, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > The current unstable nfs-utils (1.0.7-1) builds nfs-common to depend
> > on libkrb53 for NFSv4 support. Since nfs-common is
> "Jeroen" == Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeroen> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:50:35PM -0500, Chip Salzenberg
Jeroen> wrote:
>> Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal
>>
>> The current unstable nfs-utils (1.0.7-1) builds nfs-common to
>> depend on
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The current unstable nfs-utils (1.0.7-1) builds nfs-common to depend
on libkrb53 for NFSv4 support. Since nfs-common is priority
'standard', libkrb53 should also be at least priority 'standard'.
adTHANKSvance
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
6 matches
Mail list logo
