Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Package: sane-utils Version: 1.0.15-7 Severity: normal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ scanimage -L No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different, check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documenta

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > silverboxy:~# scanimage -L > > > Note: scanimage does not return to the command line. Debug log, please. SANE_DEBUG_UMAX=255 scanimage -L If your backend isn't the umax backend, replace UMAX by the backend name. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [please keep the bug log in the loop when replying] > It is umax: > > silverboxy:~# SANE_DEBUG_UMAX=255 scanimage -L > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of umax to 255. > [umax] sane_init > [umax] This is sane-umax version 1.0 build 44 > [umax] compiled wi

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Hi, On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 12:17:27PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: [root]: > > [umax] finished reading configure file > > [umax] sane_get_devices(local_only = 0) (freeze) ... [user]: > > [umax] finished reading configure file > > [umax] sane_get_devices(local_only = 0) > > device `umax1220u:lib

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Henning Meier-Geinitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not in the umax backend but maybe in the umax1220u or some other backend. > > Try > SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255 SANE_DEBUG_UMAX1220U=255 scanimage -L Right, missed it; looks like I badly need some sleep. That's the thing to do. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Am Samstag, 19. März 2005 12:17 schrieb Julien BLACHE: > Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [please keep the bug log in the loop when replying] > > > It is umax: > > > > silverboxy:~# SANE_DEBUG_UMAX=255 scanimage -L > > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of umax to 255. > > [umax] sane_in

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In your other mail you asked for another trace (?): Yes ! Thanks for providing it. > silverboxy:~# SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255 SANE_DEBUG_UMAX1220U=255 scanimage -L > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of dll to 255. [...] > [dll] load: searching backend `umax122

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > [dll] init: initializing backend `mustek' >> >> Does it stop at this point ? If yes, try to comment the mustek backend >> in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf. Might be the mustek backend hanging on the >> parallel port or something. > > Commenting out mustek and m

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Does scanning as a user work ? Could you try to unplug the scanner, >> plug it in again, and try to scan (without running scanimage -L first)? > > Yes, it does. Good. >> If that works, try moving umax1220u at the top of the list in >> /etc/sane.d/dll.c

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Seems that the --lamp-off device specific option has some specific >> > problems. >> >> Yes. Could you send a log of scanimage --lamp-off ? > > silverboxy:~# SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255 SANE_DEBUG_UMAX1220U=255 scanimage > --lamp-off > --device-name=umax1220u

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > open("/etc/ieee1284.conf", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > open("/dev/parport0", O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY) = 4 > ioctl(4, PPCLAIM, 0x4009ccce > silverboxy:~# I guess cups might have claimed the parallel p

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Am Sonntag, 20. März 2005 20:21 schrieben Sie: > Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > open("/etc/ieee1284.conf", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or > > directory) > > open("/dev/parport0", O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY) = 4 > > ioctl(4, PPCLAIM, 0x4009ccce > > silverboxy:~# > > I guess cups mig

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I guess cups might have claimed the parallel port before. Try without >> cups running if you want to be sure. There's no good way to avoid > > Stopping cups (/etc/init.d/cupsys stop) does not solve the problem. If you have the lp module loaded, it might

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Julien, sorry for the late reply. Am Sonntag, 20. März 2005 23:21 schrieben Sie: > Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I guess cups might have claimed the parallel port before. Try without > >> cups running if you want to be sure. There's no good way to avoid > > > > Stopping cups (/et

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Rainer, > The second line in syslog is caused by the scanimage -L (?): > > Mar 25 22:30:45 silverboxy kernel: ppdev0: registered pardevice > Mar 25 22:30:46 silverboxy kernel: ppdev0: registered pardevice > Mar 25 22:30:48 silverboxy kernel: ppdev0: rel

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Rainer, > Mar 25 22:30:45 silverboxy kernel: ppdev0: registered pardevice > Mar 25 22:30:46 silverboxy kernel: ppdev0: registered pardevice > Mar 25 22:30:48 silverboxy kernel: ppdev0: released pardevice because > user-space > forgot > Mar 25 22:30:48

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Rainer, > open("/dev/scanner", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > open("/etc/ieee1284.conf", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > open("/dev/parport0", O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY) = 5 > ioctl(5, PPCLAIM, 0

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Hi Julien, the syslog contains Mar 30 23:20:22 silverboxy kernel: ppdev0: registered pardevice Mar 30 23:20:24 silverboxy kernel: ppdev0: registered pardevice Mar 30 23:20:25 silverboxy kernel: ppdev0: released pardevice because user-space forgot Mar 30 23:20:25 silverboxy kernel: ppdev0: unreg

Bug#300317: sane-utils: scanimage -L does not return

Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Rainer, > I attach logs from mustek and hpsj5s (which is very short). Thanks, I'll try to find out what's going on. It may take some time. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on