Bug#301165: cacti: snmpv3 support silently removed in 0.8.6x

severity 301165 important thanks On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:53:49AM -0500, Brenden Conte wrote: > Thats debatable, as you *could* get it to work out of the box, you just > needed the same authentication and encryption password (there was only > one password field, used for both). The option of sn

Bug#301165: cacti: snmpv3 support silently removed in 0.8.6x

severity 301165 normal tags 301165 confirmed tags 301165 upstream thanks hi brenden, i'll go ahead and leave this bug open to track the issue, but i'm going to lower the severity to normal because i don't believe that it meets the justification for important since you had to hack the install to g

Bug#301165: cacti: snmpv3 support silently removed in 0.8.6x

tags 301165 confirmed tags 301165 upstream thanks hi brenden, On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:31:44AM -0500, Brenden Conte wrote: > snmpv3 support is silently removed in 0.8.6x. the impression i have is that v3 was never fully supported, and that the author has removed the options until the support i

Bug#301165: cacti: snmpv3 support silently removed in 0.8.6x

Package: cacti Version: 0.8.6c-4 Severity: important snmpv3 support is silently removed in 0.8.6x. Notes on how to restore (and rumors of an upcoming patch) can be found at http://forums.cacti.net/abount6832.html Any device using snmpv3 will show as using Version 1, and will fail to gather sta