A bit more digging on the gentoo lists reveals this:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-1766279.html#1766279
The problem is basically related to the recoding of isofs starting at
silo 1.3.0, it seems some kit (newer specially) doesn't like the new
iso first. This affects up to
> Is there any chance you could try booting an RC2 CD on this machine as well,
> just for the sake of confirming whether this is a regression? (It probably
> isn't, but the more information we have, the better.)
I tested with the following -
TC1 netinst 2004.06.15 md5 0084e8c472e7a901c503a11
clone 301478 -1
reassign -1 silo
severity -1 important
title -1 Fast Data Access MMU Miss on Ultra 1/140
merge -1 261824
thanks
Hi Vince,
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 08:06:53PM +1100, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: RC3 netinst
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/s
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC3 netinst
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/rc3/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
md5 sum 95042ee7c74ce5a512ecaba41cea225d
uname -a: unable to boot. attempted to boot 2.4.27 (default)
Date: 26 Mar 2005
Method: Boot fro
4 matches
Mail list logo
