On 01.04.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 31.03.05 Sven-Haegar Koch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
This seems to be the case - leftover configs from an uninstalled (but not
purged) package from very long ago. Looking at /var/lib/dpkg/status from a
backup taken in February
Sven-Haegar Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think I can expect that the automatic updates are able to
update from every stone old config files found from an intermediate
unstable release nearly three years ago - so perhaps this bug can just
be closed.
I agree. However, the file itself
On 31.03.05 Sven-Haegar Koch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
This is correct. However, I assumed that the file was also
specified in woody's language.dat, which is not the case.
Therefore it is clear that you or somebody (or something) must
have
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
I just wonder that you have tetex-base_1.0-10 in state rc and at the
same time tetex-base_2.0.2c-7 in state ii on the same machine. Do you
have an explanation for that?
No, no.
I had tetex-base_1.0-10 installed long time ago, and uninstalled it. It's
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
Sven Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-27
Severity: important
Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-27) ...
Merging information from /etc/texmf/texmf.d/ into /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ...
done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ...
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
This is e-TeX, Version 3.14159-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5) (INITEX) 31 MAR 2005 03:36
entering extended mode
***latex.ini
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/config/latex.ini
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/config/texsys.cfg)
Sven-Haegar Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have both a language.dat, and a language.dat.postinst-bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4345 Mar 31 03:35 language.dat
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2919 Mar 17 00:28 language.dat.postinst-bak
No, I never touched these files myself.
In both files:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
Sven-Haegar Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have both a language.dat, and a language.dat.postinst-bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4345 Mar 31 03:35 language.dat
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2919 Mar 17 00:28 language.dat.postinst-bak
No, I never touched these
severity 302286 normal
thanks
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sven-Haegar Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have both a language.dat, and a language.dat.postinst-bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4345 Mar 31 03:35 language.dat
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2919 Mar 17 00:28
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
Yes, I have both a language.dat, and a language.dat.postinst-bak
In both files:
french fr19998t.tex
This file fr19998t.tex used to be in teTeX in woody, but is no longer
there.
This is correct. However, I assumed that the file was also specified
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-27
Severity: important
Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-27) ...
Merging information from /etc/texmf/texmf.d/ into /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ...
done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ... done
Running
On 31.03.05 Sven Koch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-27) ...
Merging information from /etc/texmf/texmf.d/ into /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ...
done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ... done
Running
Sven Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-27
Severity: important
Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-27) ...
Merging information from /etc/texmf/texmf.d/ into /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ...
done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done
Regenerating
13 matches
Mail list logo
