tags 302527 + unreproducible
thanks
Djoume SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Djoume,
> No, it doesn't segfault when sm3600 is the only one enable
>
> But it still segfault when
>
> sm3600 and u12 are enable
> sm3600 and umax are enable
> sm3600 and umax1220u are enable
> (or sm3600 and sn
Djoume SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Djoume,
>> Does it segfault too if you only enable the sm3600 backend ?
>
> No, it doesn't segfault when sm3600 is the only one enable
>
> But it still segfault when
>
> sm3600 and u12 are enable
>
> or
>
> sm3600 and umax are enable
>
> or
>
> sm36
Le mardi 04/05/05 Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > sm3600 seems to be the backend which cause scanimage (and other
> > programs) to segfault.
>
> Does it segfault too if you only enable the sm3600 backend ?
No, it doesn't segfault when sm3600 is the only one enable
But it still se
Djoume SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sm3600 seems to be the backend which cause scanimage (and other
> programs) to segfault.
Does it segfault too if you only enable the sm3600 backend ?
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public key available
Le mardi 04/05/05 Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > sm3600 seems to be the backend which cause scanimage (and other
> > programs) to segfault.
>
> Hmm. valgrind produces no error on the backend...
I have try to look with valgrind by myself but I haven't found any ppc
version that wo
Djoume SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't have libsane-extras installed so I haven't try those backends,
> but I could do it if it could be usefull, just ask.
No, that was just in case.
> sm3600 seems to be the backend which cause scanimage (and other
> programs) to segfault.
Hmm. v
Le mardi 04/05/05 Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > It would be nice if you could find the backend that is causing the
> > problem, so that we can try to solve the bug.
>
> If you have/had libsane-extras installed, please try those backends
> first.
Hi,
I didn't have libsane-extras
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Many thanks, after disabling everything (except snapscan) in
>> /etc/sane.d/dll.conf evrything works fine! :-)
>> Would you like me to investigate more on this or do you already know
>> the source of the problem?
>
> It would be nice if you could find t
Djoume SALVETTI a écrit :
Many thanks, after disabling everything (except snapscan) in
/etc/sane.d/dll.conf evrything works fine! :-)
Would you like me to investigate more on this or do you already know
the source of the problem?
It would be nice if you could find the backend that is causing the
Le dimanche 04/03/05 Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Could you disable all the backends in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf *AND*
> /etc/sane.d/dll.d/* (or just purge libsane-extras if you don't need
> it) and see if it still crashes ?
Many thanks, after disabling everything (except snapscan) in
Djoume SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not able to use my AGFA snapscan e25 USB scanner on my powerbook
> running Debian sid. Every program I have tried segfault (scanimage,
> xscanimage, xcam) or eat 100% of my CPU (xsane).
Could you disable all the backends in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf *AN
Djoume SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Neither Aurélien nor I could reproduce the problem. Tagging
>> unreproducible, if there's any progress on your side, do not hesitate
>> to tell us.
>
> I have installed libc6-dbg.
Useless, it's not a libc bug. It may even not be a bug at all, as
you'
Le samedi 04/02/05 Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Neither Aurélien nor I could reproduce the problem. Tagging
> unreproducible, if there's any progress on your side, do not hesitate
> to tell us.
I have installed libc6-dbg.
The backtrace is now a little bit more readable :
(gdb)
tags 302527 + unreproducible
thanks
Djoume SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x300928c4 in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x300928c4 in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #1 0x30092768 in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #
Le vendredi 04/01/05 Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> What does "file scanimage" tell about your scanimage binary ? It
> should tell you it's not stripped. By the way, you need to have
> /usr/lib/sane/libsane-snapscan.so.1.0.15 as a non-stripped binary if
> you want to get something us
Djoume SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (gdb) exec-file scanimage -L
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /usr/bin/scanimage
> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x300928c4 in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6
> (gdb) b
Le vendredi 04/01/05 Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > If it could be useful, I can try to recompiled sane with debug
> > information and send a gdb backtrace.
>
> That'd be good, because it doesn't segfault here with my snapscan
> scanner.
Here is the backtrace :
(gdb) exec-file
Djoume SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snapscan] Read 8 bytes
> [snapscan] 2nd read 4 write 2
> [snapscan] snapscani_init_device_structure()
> [snapscan] sane_snapscan_get_devices (0x7fffe378, 0)
> Segmentation fault
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
>
> If it could be useful, I can try to recompiled
Package: sane-utils
Version: 1.0.15-8
Severity: normal
Good day,
I'm not able to use my AGFA snapscan e25 USB scanner on my powerbook
running Debian sid. Every program I have tried segfault (scanimage,
xscanimage, xcam) or eat 100% of my CPU (xsane).
My scanner works fine with my other laptop (
19 matches
Mail list logo
