Bug#304178: FW: Bug#304178: gpsbabel: broken on amd64

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Mon, 11 Apr 2005] Robert Lipe wrote: > If I'm guessing this problem correctly, it only impacts the read of > waypoints when the alt is unknown, right? That's a known outtage in Yup. > The core problem is that GPSBabel has a (bad) concept of "unknown alt" > and the Garmin protocols have

Bug#304178: FW: Bug#304178: gpsbabel: broken on amd64

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Lipe
> amd64, ia32 emulation on an amd64 and ppc32 produce the same -- mostly > correct -- result for r/w/t now. Yay. I've committed this fix to my tree. Thanx. > But things like still appear (they > also happen with 1.2.4 on i386): (ele should be zero/undefined) > > > 99956202352624743

Bug#304178: FW: Bug#304178: gpsbabel: broken on amd64

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Mon, 11 Apr 2005] Robert Lipe wrote: > If you can report success with the attached patch on Power, i386, and > amd64, this change is golden in my book and I'll commit it. amd64, ia32 emulation on an amd64 and ppc32 produce the same -- mostly correct -- result for r/w/t now. But things li

Bug#304178: FW: Bug#304178: gpsbabel: broken on amd64

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Lipe
> I knew I was missing something... it doesn't say Vista anywhere in/on > the thing... Precious. The ones in the US have it right below the product family name. http://www.garmin.com/products/etrexVista/hi.html > > and rebuild tell me if it works. I'm not really proposing that as a >

Bug#304178: FW: Bug#304178: gpsbabel: broken on amd64

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Mon, 11 Apr 2005] Robert Lipe wrote: > > It's a Garmin eTrex (B/W) Firmware version 3.60. > > It's a "eTrex Vista". "etrex" refers to the whole family and the > unadorned name "etrex" refers to the little cheapo non-maping unit. I knew I was missing something... it doesn't say Vista anyw

Bug#304178: FW: Bug#304178: gpsbabel: broken on amd64

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! [Mon, 11 Apr 2005] Robert Lipe wrote: > > Downloading from garmin does not cause the high CPU load I was > > I never received a complaint about this, but I'm assuming you're giving > a nod to this change: > > > revision 1.18 > date: 2004/11/01 17:34:28; autho

Bug#304178: FW: Bug#304178: gpsbabel: broken on amd64

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Lipe
Robert Jordens wrote: > Downloading from garmin does not cause the high CPU load I was I never received a complaint about this, but I'm assuming you're giving a nod to this change: revision 1.18 date: 2004/11/01 17:34:28; author: robertl; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1

Bug#304178: FW: Bug#304178: gpsbabel: broken on amd64

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Jordens
Hello! This is the released 1.2.5 (as a debian package): Downloading from garmin does not cause the high CPU load I was experiencing before but still results in bad data: 999562023526247432192.00 c^P c^P Waypoint Everything succeeds: (gdb) run Starting program: /home/rj/work