Bug#304718: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#304718: mutt: exim4 deletes bcc field, so maybe it's time to set write_bcc?]

2006-01-02 Thread Adam M. Costello
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that in older versions of mutt, any Bcc header would be passed to the sendmail program, whereas in 1.5.9-2 (and presumably later versions), the write_bcc option is only made use of when saving a message to a mailbox (in mutt_write_rfc822_headers

Bug#304718: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#304718: mutt: exim4 deletes bcc field, so maybe it's time to set write_bcc?]

2006-01-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 12:14:28AM +, Adam M. Costello wrote: Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that in older versions of mutt, any Bcc header would be passed to the sendmail program, whereas in 1.5.9-2 (and presumably later versions), the write_bcc option is only made