Am Dienstag, 6. September 2005 01:02 schrieb ich:
> Having a directory with pubkey files in it seems to be a good idea to me.
> I just read gpgv(1) and it says you can pass --keyring several times.
> That means we don't have to build the keyring that holds all keys, and
> we do not need gpg.
The t
Followup-For: Bug #304846
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.40.1
Hi all,
Having a directory with pubkey files in it seems to be a good idea to me.
I just read gpgv(1) and it says you can pass --keyring several times.
That means we don't have to build the keyring that holds all keys, and
we do not need gp
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:00:18PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > Currently, apt 0.6 uses a single binary file as its keyring in /etc/apt.
> > This has the disadvantage that modifying it requires special tools like
> > apt-key, and so key manageme
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Currently, apt 0.6 uses a single binary file as its keyring in /etc/apt.
> This has the disadvantage that modifying it requires special tools like
> apt-key, and so key management is a pain.
>
> The following patch makes apt use a directory in etc/apt
Package: apt
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Version: 0.6.25
- Forwarded message from Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: replace /etc/apt/trusted.gpg with /etc/apt/trusted-keys/
To: Debian Development
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:37:
5 matches
Mail list logo
