Bug#305751: keepalived doesn't run with debians default kernel

2005-05-16 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi Marcin! On Mon, 16 May 2005, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > Thanks. Is the problem with VRRP syncd the only serious one? I'm asking > because I need to decide whether to upgrade to 2.6, or stay with 2.4 > (I'm only using one director so far, so I don't care about VRRP). It should be the only one, it

Bug#305751: keepalived doesn't run with debians default kernel

2005-05-16 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:18:15PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Hi Marcin! > > On Wed, 04 May 2005, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:34:12PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > you are right, keepalived doesn't work with the debian default kernel. > > > The ipvs code used i

Bug#305751: keepalived doesn't run with debians default kernel

2005-05-04 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi Marcin! On Wed, 04 May 2005, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:34:12PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > you are right, keepalived doesn't work with the debian default kernel. > > The ipvs code used in the default kernel is buggy, so keepalived is build > > against the ipvs hea

Bug#305751: keepalived doesn't run with debians default kernel

2005-05-04 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:34:12PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > you are right, keepalived doesn't work with the debian default kernel. > The ipvs code used in the default kernel is buggy, so keepalived is build > against the ipvs headers from 2.6.11/2.4.28. Could you provide more details on how

Bug#305751: keepalived doesn't run with debians default kernel

2005-04-29 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi Marcin, you are right, keepalived doesn't work with the debian default kernel. The ipvs code used in the default kernel is buggy, so keepalived is build against the ipvs headers from 2.6.11/2.4.28. It was my fault not to mention that fact in the documentation, I updated the package description