On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 03:54:10PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 05:07:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The new version that was uploaded was -3.4, not -3.3. So you haven't really
> > tested anything, since the version you just showed output from was the same
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 05:07:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> The new version that was uploaded was -3.4, not -3.3. So you haven't really
> tested anything, since the version you just showed output from was the same
> you reported on earlier. :)
Ok, it is getting better. However, the probl
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:58:34PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:20:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:42:43PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > the new new version of f2c does not cut it either on m68k:
> >
> > > S
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:20:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:42:43PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the new new version of f2c does not cut it either on m68k:
>
> > Setting up f2c (20020621-3.3) ...
>
> > (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/buildd/f
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:42:43PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hi,
> the new new version of f2c does not cut it either on m68k:
> Setting up f2c (20020621-3.3) ...
> (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/buildd/fseries-201.10059/src# f2c <
> Y2-fracdiffBuiltin.f
>fracdf:
> Compiler er
Hi,
the new new version of f2c does not cut it either on m68k:
Setting up f2c (20020621-3.3) ...
(unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/buildd/fseries-201.10059/src# f2c <
Y2-fracdiffBuiltin.f
fracdf:
Compiler error line 244 of : start_formatting: couldn't open the
intermediate file
Whereas -3.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 10:25:56AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This looks like a pretty serious regression in the latest security NMU of
> > f2c. The code now reads:
> > char *c_functions = "c_functions";
> > char *coutput = "c_output";
> > char *initfname
Steve Langasek wrote:
> This looks like a pretty serious regression in the latest security NMU of
> f2c. The code now reads:
>
> char *c_functions = "c_functions";
> char *coutput = "c_output";
> char *initfname = "raw_data";
> char *initbname = "raw_data.b";
> cha
tags 305971 patch
thanks
Oh what the heck, here's a patch.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:58:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 10:50:15AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Package: f2c
> > Version: 20020621-3.2
> > Seve
Joey,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 10:50:15AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Package: f2c
> Version: 20020621-3.2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: segfaults on m68k which causes r-base build to fail (and
> probably others as well)
> On m68k, r-base and a few other packages need f2c to buil
Package: f2c
Version: 20020621-3.2
Severity: serious
Justification: segfaults on m68k which causes r-base build to fail (and
probably others as well)
On m68k, r-base and a few other packages need f2c to build. The latest
release of R fails to build on m68k with f2c segfaulting:
http://buildd.deb
11 matches
Mail list logo
