-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don,
I tested your latest patch against -9 on sarge/i386 and sid/ppc and it
worked without problems both upgrading and installing from scratch
with a clean tetex install. Not that this is any guarantee of
perfection, but the patch looks clean and I
Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don,
I tested your latest patch against -9 on sarge/i386 and sid/ppc and it
worked without problems both upgrading and installing from scratch
with a clean tetex install. Not that this is any guarantee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
Does the woody upgrade need testing?
- --
Roger Leigh
Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well
as
a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
Does the woody
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:34:39AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a followup for your report:
http://bugs.debian.org/262395
The report end up with :
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.efmt installed.
reopen 262395
tags 262395 + sid
thanks
Hi,
xmltex 1.9-9 does not fix the postinst failure:
Setting up xmltex (1.9-9) ...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
texhash: Updating
On 27.04.05 Richard Lewis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
fmtutil: running `tex -ini -jobname=xmltex -progname=xmltex latex
xmltex.ini' ...
This is TeX, Version 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.4) (INITEX)
---! /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt was written by
Looks like jadetex problem #298437.
Unfortunately no.
What version of jadetex do you
have installed (or was trying to be installed with tetex)?
The latest one in sid+experimental:
ii jadetex 3.13-6 generator of printable output from
SGML or XML using J
--
reassign 306595 xmltex
severity 306595 important
merge 306595 262395
severity 262395 serious
tags 262395 +patch
thanks
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 07:40:00PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
Could you give us the contents of the files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/
Here is what I have:
-rw-r--r-- 1
Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here is the problem:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-3) ...
Merging information from /etc/texmf/texmf.d/ into /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ...
done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
Error:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-3
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-3) ...
Merging information from /etc/texmf/texmf.d/ into
Followup for :
http://bugs.debian.org/306595
i fixed the jadetex upgrade with fmtutil --all
iso i looks like some remains from old experimental/woody or who
knows.
Though xmltex seems really broken.
Cheers
Alban
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
14 matches
Mail list logo
