On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:23:04PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Brian Nelson [Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:09:01 -0700]:
[...]
I plan to maintain the packaging in a distributed version control
system, once I figure out which of the 20 or so is the most practical.
OK. If you finally choose
On 10273 March 1977, Brian Nelson wrote:
[Brian Nelson]
* Package name: qt-x11-opensource
Version : 4.0 beta 2
Upstream Author : Trolltech AS
Is there some reason for the -opensource in the name?
It's the upstream name. For whatever reason, Trolltech has chosen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: qt-x11-opensource
Version : 4.0 beta 2
Upstream Author : Trolltech AS
* URL or Web page : http://www.trolltech.com
* License : Dual GPL/QPL
Description : Qt 4 cross-platform C++ application framework
Qt is a
[Brian Nelson]
* Package name: qt-x11-opensource
Version : 4.0 beta 2
Upstream Author : Trolltech AS
Is there some reason for the -opensource in the name? That's a
pretty redundant designation for something in Debian main, don't you
think? I'd probably go with qt4 or libqt4
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:10:44PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Brian Nelson]
* Package name: qt-x11-opensource
Version : 4.0 beta 2
Upstream Author : Trolltech AS
Is there some reason for the -opensource in the name?
It's the upstream name. For whatever reason,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:38:57PM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote:
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 10:09 pm, Brian Nelson wrote:
I would like to group-maintain this package and have set the maintainer
to Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org in the
preliminary packages. Please let
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:36:00PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:10:44PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Brian Nelson]
* Package name: qt-x11-opensource
Version : 4.0 beta 2
Upstream Author : Trolltech AS
Is there some reason for the
7 matches
Mail list logo