Hi Arthur,
It seems this bug still exists in devfsd package. Given that the only
kernel planned as part of the etch release is 2.6.16+ which has no support
for devfs, perhaps it's time to request removal of devfsd from etch/sid?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
severity 306990 grave
found 306990 1.3.25-23
thanks
I see this problem with the current unstable/sid packages. To
reproduce it, install ltsp-server and run this command:
ltsp-build-client --dist sid --mirror http://ftp.skolelinux.no/debian
After a while, this error occures:
[...]
tags 306990 patch
thanks
Hi folks,
How does this patch look?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog
--- devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog
+++ devfsd-1.3.25/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+devfsd (1.3.25-22.1)
John Goerzen schrieb:
Well, like I said, devfs was unpacked but not configured. Init
scripts are conffiles, and so they aren't created until the
configuration stage.
They are unpacked just as every other file, except that the
backup file is kept.
--
Secure email, spread GPG, clearsign all
Hi
Steve Langasek schrieb:
How does this patch look?
Ahrg, I just notice I introduced a similar check (in the
findfiles function though) in my local version but forgot to
update the changelog or upload it. This is in 1.3.25-23 now.
Fixing this there remains the problem of invoke-rc.d failing.
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:10:44PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
Steve Langasek schrieb:
How does this patch look?
Ahrg, I just notice I introduced a similar check (in the
findfiles function though) in my local version but forgot to
update the changelog or upload it. This is in 1.3.25-23 now.
John Goerzen schrieb:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 12:19:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
find: /etc/devfs/symlinks.d: No such file or directory
invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/devfsd not found.
The lvm-common postinstallation script does not contain this commands
but calls
lvm-common does not depend on devfsd and it should not. John,
can you tell me which version of devfsd you exactly installed
when you had that problem. I seems you had the update-devfsd
script on your system but _not_ devfsd's init script, but I
can't think of a way this could happen.
ciao, 2ri
--
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 07:54:10PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
lvm-common does not depend on devfsd and it should not. John,
can you tell me which version of devfsd you exactly installed
when you had that problem. I seems you had the update-devfsd
script on your system but _not_ devfsd's init
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.01.04-5
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to install
Setting up lvm-common (1.5.17) ...
find: /etc/devfs/symlinks.d: No such file or directory
invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/devfsd not found.
dpkg: error processing lvm-common (--configure):
subprocess
reassign 306990 lvm-common
severity 306990 important
tags 306990 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:33:03PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Setting up lvm-common (1.5.17) ...
find: /etc/devfs/symlinks.d: No such file or directory
invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript,
reassign 306990 devfsd
tags 306990 - unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 00:19 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
reassign 306990 lvm-common
severity 306990 important
tags 306990 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
[...]
So now the problem:
find: /etc/devfs/symlinks.d: No such
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 12:19:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
2. lvm2 depends on lvm-common.
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
3. amd64 is no Debian architecture.
The problem actually occured on i386; I was just running reportbug in
amd64.
So now the problem:
13 matches
Mail list logo
