On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:58:34PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:59:43AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Some of us like to use -Werror. Some of boost does not.
That's a little cryptic. ;-)
no, it isn't :)
I assume you're saying that some boost code generates
also sprach Steve M. Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.11.0358 +0200]:
Some of us like to use -Werror. Some of boost does not.
That's a little cryptic. ;-)
I assume you're saying that some boost code generates a warning.
What warning?
unused variable t
-const
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:59:43AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Some of us like to use -Werror. Some of boost does not.
That's a little cryptic. ;-)
I assume you're saying that some boost code generates a warning.
What warning?
Please
consider the following, non-intrusive and tested
Package: libboost-dev
Version: 1.32.0-6
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream patch
Some of us like to use -Werror. Some of boost does not. Please
consider the following, non-intrusive and tested patches:
diff -u /tmp/interface_oarchive.hpp
/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/interface_oarchive.hpp
---
: please prevent compiler warning about unused variable
Some of us like to use -Werror. Some of boost does not. Please
consider the following, non-intrusive and tested patches:
diff -u /tmp/interface_oarchive.hpp
/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/interface_oarchive.hpp
--- /tmp
5 matches
Mail list logo