Bug#308291: please prevent compiler warning about unused variable

2005-05-11 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:58:34PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:59:43AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: Some of us like to use -Werror. Some of boost does not. That's a little cryptic. ;-) no, it isn't :) I assume you're saying that some boost code generates

Bug#308291: please prevent compiler warning about unused variable

2005-05-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve M. Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.11.0358 +0200]: Some of us like to use -Werror. Some of boost does not. That's a little cryptic. ;-) I assume you're saying that some boost code generates a warning. What warning? unused variable t -const

Bug#308291: please prevent compiler warning about unused variable

2005-05-10 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:59:43AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: Some of us like to use -Werror. Some of boost does not. That's a little cryptic. ;-) I assume you're saying that some boost code generates a warning. What warning? Please consider the following, non-intrusive and tested

Bug#308291: please prevent compiler warning about unused variable

2005-05-09 Thread martin f krafft
Package: libboost-dev Version: 1.32.0-6 Severity: minor Tags: upstream patch Some of us like to use -Werror. Some of boost does not. Please consider the following, non-intrusive and tested patches: diff -u /tmp/interface_oarchive.hpp /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/interface_oarchive.hpp ---

Bug#308291: archive's i/o register_type() signature (Bug#308291: please prevent compiler warning about unused variable)

2005-05-09 Thread Domenico Andreoli
: please prevent compiler warning about unused variable Some of us like to use -Werror. Some of boost does not. Please consider the following, non-intrusive and tested patches: diff -u /tmp/interface_oarchive.hpp /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/interface_oarchive.hpp --- /tmp