tag 308339 pending
thanks
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Package: jakarta-log4j1.2
Library packages should not have a version-specific source-package name,
unless there is a good reason to need to have multiple versions.
Considering the number of
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:24:12AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Fri, 13 May 2005 00:02:58 +0200,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:51:02PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
You mean creating a tarball with the two different versions of the
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The log4j transition took more than a year!
I didn't follow that at all, but why did this transition take so long?
Most transitions can be done easily within a month or even shorter.
Because the maintainer (me) was/is lazy.
--
* Sufficiently
Fri, 13 May 2005 17:13:52 +0300,
Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The log4j transition took more than a year!
I didn't follow that at all, but why did this transition take so long?
Most transitions can be done easily within a month or
Mon, 9 May 2005 19:47:46 +0200,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:25:24PM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
[...]
Well, I think it was due to the old jakarta-log4j source package
which has currently a pending removal request and you have just
removed :-)
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:51:02PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Mon, 9 May 2005 19:47:46 +0200,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:25:24PM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
[...]
Well, I think it was due to the old jakarta-log4j source package
Package: jakarta-log4j1.2
Library packages should not have a version-specific source-package name,
unless there is a good reason to need to have multiple versions.
Considering the number of packages depending on log4j, this seems not to
be the case here.
The source package can best be named
Hi Jeroen,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Package: jakarta-log4j1.2
Library packages should not have a version-specific source-package name,
unless there is a good reason to need to have multiple versions.
Considering the number of packages depending on log4j, this seems not to
be the case here.
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:25:24PM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
Hi Jeroen,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Package: jakarta-log4j1.2
Library packages should not have a version-specific source-package name,
unless there is a good reason to need to have multiple versions.
Considering the
9 matches
Mail list logo
