Bug#309111: [GNUTLS-SA-2005-1] DoS security problem in gnutls =1.0.24 (and =1.2.3)

2005-05-15 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
Hi, Attached a patch from cvs which fixes the problem. Regards, Matthijs Mohlmann === RCS file: /cvs/gnutls/gnutls/lib/gnutls_cipher.c,v retrieving revision 2.70.2.4 retrieving revision 2.70.2.5 diff -u -r2.70.2.4 -r2.70.2.5 ---

Bug#309111: [GNUTLS-SA-2005-1] DoS security problem in gnutls =1.0.24 (and =1.2.3)

2005-05-15 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
Hi, It seems that the last part of the patch is already applied. Sorry, i didn't noticed that. Regards, Matthijs Mohlmann signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#309111: [GNUTLS-SA-2005-1] DoS security problem in gnutls =1.0.24 (and =1.2.3)

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Matthijs, On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:44:44PM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: Attached a patch from cvs which fixes the problem. What does the second part of this patch have to do with the first? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer

Bug#309111: [GNUTLS-SA-2005-1] DoS security problem in gnutls =1.0.24 (and =1.2.3)

2005-05-15 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
Hi, It was in the same commit in cvs as the first part and i thought it has something todo with the security problem. Later i reviewed the patch again and the second part seems already applied by a previous upload. It was included in the patch I submitted by accident. I'm still wondering why

Bug#309111: [GNUTLS-SA-2005-1] DoS security problem in gnutls =1.0.24 (and =1.2.3)

2005-05-14 Thread Vincent Deffontaines
Package: libgnutls11 Version: 1.0.16-9 Severity: serious The current libgnutls11 ships with a major bug, which improperly checks user provided data, and can easily lead to denial of service attacks. The bug was discovered by INL during a security audit of NuFW, and reported to the gnutls