Bug#309386: False positive if epmd (from erlang-base) is running

2005-11-24 Thread lantz moore
Peter Thomassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: chkrootkit Version: 0.45-1 If the Erlang portmapper daemon (epmd) included in erlang-base is running, chkrootkit reports: | Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 4369) This is wrong, please fix this. For reference, using

Bug#309386: False positive if epmd (from erlang-base) is running

2005-11-24 Thread Peter Thomassen
Am Donnerstag, 24. November 2005 22:50 schrieb lantz moore: bindshell listens on port 4369. chkrootkit bases it's checks simply on whether the port is being listened on. this is the design that upstream prefers, so this will not be fixed (any time soon). Is there any possibility, e.g. a

Bug#309386: False positive if epmd (from erlang-base) is running

2005-11-24 Thread lantz moore
Peter Thomassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am Donnerstag, 24. November 2005 22:50 schrieb lantz moore: bindshell listens on port 4369. chkrootkit bases it's checks simply on whether the port is being listened on. this is the design that upstream prefers, so this will not be fixed (any time

Bug#309386: False positive if epmd (from erlang-base) is running

2005-05-16 Thread Peter Thomassen
Package: chkrootkit Version: 0.45-1 If the Erlang portmapper daemon (epmd) included in erlang-base is running, chkrootkit reports: | Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 4369) This is wrong, please fix this. For reference, using erlang-base 1:10.b.1a-2.2 from unstable, epmd is located