On 16 May 2005 at 21:25, Steve Langasek wrote:
| Package: libquantlib0
| Version: 0.3.9-1
| Severity: serious
|
| Hi Dirk,
|
| Reviewing the changes in quantlib 0.3.9-2 has brought this fact to my
| attention:
|
| $ dpkg -c q/quantlib/libquantlib0_0.2.1.cvs20020322-1_i386.deb |grep
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:18:41AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| $ dpkg -c q/quantlib/libquantlib0_0.3.9-1_i386.deb |grep libQuantLib
| -rw-r--r-- root/root 5192416 2005-05-02 22:22:23
./usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.9.so
| -rw-r--r-- root/root208464 2005-05-02 22:22:23
On 17 May 2005 at 03:34, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:18:41AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| | $ dpkg -c q/quantlib/libquantlib0_0.3.9-1_i386.deb |grep libQuantLib
| | -rw-r--r-- root/root 5192416 2005-05-02 22:22:23
./usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.9.so
| | -rw-r--r--
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 06:20:45AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| No, if you're going to provide a shared library for use by other packages in
| the archive, these are the rules that have to be followed. They are not
| arbitrary requirements; there really is no other way to properly
On 17 May 2005 at 04:32, Steve Langasek wrote:
| So I guess it would have to become libquantlib-0.3.9 and
| libquantlib-0.3.9-dev as with, say libstdc++5 ?
|
| Is there a reason to use a versioned name for the -dev package? If not,
| it's probably fine to leave it as libquantlib0-dev, which
Package: libquantlib0
Version: 0.3.9-1
Severity: serious
Hi Dirk,
Reviewing the changes in quantlib 0.3.9-2 has brought this fact to my
attention:
$ dpkg -c q/quantlib/libquantlib0_0.2.1.cvs20020322-1_i386.deb |grep libQuantLib
-rw-r--r-- root/root 2815996 2002-03-23 14:49:03
6 matches
Mail list logo
