Hi,
On dim, oct 02, 2005, Loïc Minier wrote:
Commited in unstable/, we'll see how it goes and what we port to 2.8
when the question of a 2.8 uplaod to unstable comes back.
The problem is still there for pango because of the query bianry in
common.
I propose to make the package
Hi Seb, hi Akira Tagoh,
Do you recall why libgtk2.0-common depends on libgtk2.0-0?
I could only find a changelog snipset in 2.4.1-1:
* Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ debian/control:
- added libgtk2.0-0 to Depends for libgtk2.0-common. (from 2.2.4-6).
- libgtk2.0-dev
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 11:08:34 +0200,
LM == Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LM Hi Seb, hi Akira Tagoh,
LM Do you recall why libgtk2.0-common depends on libgtk2.0-0?
LM I could only find a changelog snipset in 2.4.1-1:
LM * Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LM + debian/control:
LM
On dim, oct 02, 2005, Akira TAGOH wrote:
Well, there was the upgrading issue IIRC. I don't remember
the details though.
Since we're done with the woody - sarge upgrade, I think we can break
the loop again, as dependency loops cause trouble too.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 16:02:39 +0200,
LM == Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LM On dim, oct 02, 2005, Akira TAGOH wrote:
Well, there was the upgrading issue IIRC. I don't remember
the details though.
LM Since we're done with the woody - sarge upgrade, I think we can break
LM the loop
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005, Akira TAGOH wrote:
Er, I thought it was that libgtk2.0-0 or libgtk2.0-common
wasn't updated or either package was only updated on usual
dist-upgrade. something like that. Nevertheless you can try
it and revert it any time if it causes another trouble. Good
luck :)
I
Le dimanche 02 octobre 2005 à 16:18 +0200, Loïc Minier a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005, Akira TAGOH wrote:
Er, I thought it was that libgtk2.0-0 or libgtk2.0-common
wasn't updated or either package was only updated on usual
dist-upgrade. something like that. Nevertheless you can try
it
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
go for it :)
Commited in unstable/, we'll see how it goes and what we port to 2.8
when the question of a 2.8 uplaod to unstable comes back.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:25:32PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Hi Bill,
Hi Loïc,
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
libpango1.0-0 depends on libpango1.0-common and libpango1.0-common
depends on libpango1.0-0. This is a circular dependency and cause
problem during woody to
Package: libpango1.0-0
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: important
Hello Sebastien,
libpango1.0-0 depends on libpango1.0-common and libpango1.0-common
depends on libpango1.0-0. This is a circular dependency and cause
problem during woody to sarge upgrade.
dpkg: dependency problems prevent
10 matches
Mail list logo
