Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> Some time ago, a bug was posted about tiff being vulnerable to
> CAN-2005-1544: a bug that caused and exploitable segmentation fault on
> files with certain bad BitsPerSample values (making it a potential DOS
> bug). The fix is already in sarge. I had posted a patch aga
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached patch is identical to the other one except that it also
> patches debian/changelog. Feel free to disregard that part and
> treat this a security NMU.
Of course, my patch had a distribution of unstable which is obviously
wrong. But you wo
Some time ago, a bug was posted about tiff being vulnerable to
CAN-2005-1544: a bug that caused and exploitable segmentation fault on
files with certain bad BitsPerSample values (making it a potential DOS
bug). The fix is already in sarge. I had posted a patch against the
version of the package
3 matches
Mail list logo