On Saturday 28 May 2005 22:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 28-05-2005 21:45, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
I'm currently working on a conversion script (not part of
maintainer-scripts), that'll migrate path approach to desktop-profiles
You don't like my cfengine script? I wrote it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-05-2005 15:44, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Saturday 28 May 2005 22:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 28-05-2005 21:45, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
I'm currently working on a conversion script (not part of
maintainer-scripts),
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 21-05-2005 00:45, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
my hack does nothing in itself, the gconf path file is not being changed
behind the admin's back, or on the packages initiative.
_The_admin_is_the_acting_party_
Please elaborate
I'm currently working on a conversion script (not part of
maintainer-scripts), that'll migrate path approach to desktop-profiles
I'm currently unsure about wether to provide a hook through which the admin
can start that script from within the package installation or not.
This bug seams to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28-05-2005 21:45, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
I'm currently working on a conversion script (not part of
maintainer-scripts), that'll migrate path approach to desktop-profiles
You don't like my cfengine script? I wrote it specifically for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21-05-2005 00:45, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
my hack does nothing in itself, the gconf path file is not being changed
behind the admin's back, or on the packages initiative.
_The_admin_is_the_acting_party_
Please elaborate on
On Friday 20 May 2005 12:28, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 20-05-2005 10:46, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
was planning on contacting the gconf2 maintainer already (I'll probably
get around to that this weekend), I don't expect that
Package: desktop-profiles
Version: 1.4.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
The file /etc/gconf2/path is a conffile owned by the package gconf2.
Postinst of desktop-profiles offers through debconf to mess with that
file. That is a violation of Debian Policy section 10.7.4.
I see no
On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Package: desktop-profiles
Version: 1.4.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
The file /etc/gconf2/path is a conffile owned by the package gconf2.
That file is left alone by default on installation of desktop-profiles.
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-05-2005 10:46, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Package: desktop-profiles
Version: 1.4.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
The file /etc/gconf2/path is a conffile owned by
On Friday 20 May 2005 12:28, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 20-05-2005 10:46, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
c) Provide your hack only as a tweak
that's the current situation I think, no?
No. Your hack replaces the file, ignoring any and
11 matches
Mail list logo
