Hi,
On Saturday 05 April 2008 22:22, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
When did that change?
Or was that the case throughout the lifetime of this bug?
I've changed my opinion when I became aware that installing the package itself
does no harm.
regards,
Holger
pgpQzWEHxSdz2.pgp
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I understand that severity of bug#311188 has been lowered to non-RC by
the Debian Edu maintainers.
I also understand from the bugreport that the severity change happened
in coordination with the release team.
Could the release team please
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 01:48:43PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I understand that severity of bug#311188 has been lowered to non-RC by
the Debian Edu maintainers.
I also understand from the bugreport that the severity change happened
in coordination with the release team.
Could the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 02:36:36PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 01:48:43PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I understand that severity of bug#311188 has been lowered to non-RC by
the Debian Edu maintainers.
I also understand
Hi,
if you install debian-edu-config on a debian system, nothing bad and policy
violating happens.
If you choose to run a certain script shipped inside the debian-edu-config
package, it will modify configuration files as you expressed you wish, as you
ran that script.
If you choose to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 05:11:34PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
if you install debian-edu-config on a debian system, nothing bad and
policy violating happens.
Thanks for your opinion on this.
When did that change?
Or was that the case throughout
6 matches
Mail list logo
