Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 07:48 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> As I said, this is a bug in a historical package, not a current one.
It _is_ current for the poor sods that use stable.
--
|=| Michael Piefel
|=| Member of the Debian project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> /etc/printcap is a "conffile" of lpr-ppd ; if
> lpr-ppd is removed, /etc/printcap will still be there ;
> but if you purge lpr-ppd , dpkg will delete /etc/printcap ,
> since it is not a conffile of lprng
lprng used to have /etc/printca
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 04:46 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > The simple answer is "well, don't
> > purge packages without looking at the conffile list!".
> Are you serious? You want the users to always look at the conffile l
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 04:46 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> The simple answer is "well, don't
> purge packages without looking at the conffile list!".
Are you serious? You want the users to always look at the conffile list,
just in case the package has declared the wrong file at its conffil
* A Mennucc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050601 13:38]:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> > Package: lpr-ppd
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> >
> > Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But
> > after the ch
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:20:09PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> maybe this problem may be mentioned in the Sarge release notes ?
Please contact debian-doc@lists.debian.org about adding it to the release
notes if you think it should be mentioned.
IMHO, it seems like a minor issue; I don't think the r
maybe this problem may be mentioned in the Sarge release notes ?
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:46:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> > any suggestions?
>
> I don't see any reason to worry about it; I think it was a bug for lpr-ppd
>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> > Package: lpr-ppd
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> >
> > Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But
> > a
hi
I am sending this mail to many recipients since I need help
-
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Package: lpr-ppd
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But
> a
Package: lpr-ppd
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But
after the change, I was left with no /etc/printcap and a dead link to
that location from /etc/lprng/printcap. Clearly, there is an upgrade
path missin
10 matches
Mail list logo
