If the alternative bug was between two experimental package you
need not bother about adding hacks to fix it. Regarding the high
unstability of those , else we would end up rendering tests in
experimental too heavy to deal.
I don't know what is the best way to tell us how to fix the
breakage from
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 01:21:24PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> Regarding the alternative removal from preinst, I would keep it for some
> time, until the -1 -> -2+ mess is mostly addressed by users (say, at most
> 1-2 months), and then remove it. It is a bug that might cause manual mode be
> lo
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:57:21AM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> Hi, Carlos,
>
> I am now at home on dial-up with a woody box, so everything writen below
> should not be taken very seriously, I am writing after what I remember from
> this CET afternoon,
>
> diffing fp-compiler.postinst-1 and fp-
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:08:04PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> 2005/6/2, Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Seems that to make things really smooth something in the preinst is
> > needed in this case to work around the bug introduced in -1, just
> > reconfiguring after -2.2 does not help.
>
2005/6/2, Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Seems that to make things really smooth something in the preinst is
> needed in this case to work around the bug introduced in -1, just
> reconfiguring after -2.2 does not help.
This is weird. Here's what I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian$ sudo upda
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:01:06PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> 2005/6/2, Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have been trying to check if the upgrade from the buggy package to
> > a fixed one works with only the prerm change, or needs some ad-hoc
> > stuff, but funnily I cannot reproduce t
2005/6/2, Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have been trying to check if the upgrade from the buggy package to
> a fixed one works with only the prerm change, or needs some ad-hoc
> stuff, but funnily I cannot reproduce the problem today. Reinstalling
> fp-compiler 2.0.0-2 over and over, whic
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:54:22AM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> 2005/6/1, Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:04:21AM -0300, Guilherme Mesquita Gondim
> > (semente) wrote:
> > > Setting up fp-compiler (2.0.0-2) ...
> > > update-alternatives: slave link name /usr/sh
2005/6/1, Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:04:21AM -0300, Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente)
> wrote:
> > Setting up fp-compiler (2.0.0-2) ...
> > update-alternatives: slave link name /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz duplicated
> > dpkg: error processing fp-compiler (--
tag 311436 patch
thanks
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:00PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:04:21AM -0300, Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente)
> wrote:
> > Package: fp-compiler
> > Version: 2.0.0-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
>
> > Set
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:04:21AM -0300, Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente)
wrote:
> Package: fp-compiler
> Version: 2.0.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Setting up fp-compiler (2.0.0-2) ...
> update-alternatives: slave link name /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz dupl
Package: fp-compiler
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
# LC_ALL=POSIX sudo aptitude dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
No packages will be installed, upgr
12 matches
Mail list logo
