Bug#311709: #311709: not a bug, imho

2007-09-23 Thread Christian Perrier
> > - the name resolution for mount.cifs is the same than the kernel's one > > Mmm, I don't think that's true. I don't think the kernel does any name > resolution at all, I believe mount.cifs is doing name resolution via libc > before passing the request to the kernel. Sure. My thoughts were co

Bug#311709: #311709: not a bug, imho

2007-09-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:51:28PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > I think that *all these* are incorrect: > - there is no reason for mount.cifs to use settings in > smb.conf. Nothing is advertised as such in its documentation and, even > if it is provided along with samba, this is essentially a

Bug#311709: #311709: not a bug, imho

2007-09-19 Thread Christian Perrier
user [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertags 309139 toclose 200710 thanks From the bug report: >When mount.cifs takes a UNC name such as "//server/share" and tries >to find the host "server", it uses gethostbyname() on "server". This >works fine if CIFS hosts can be resolved by DNS, but when the name >needs