Hi,
thanks.
I noticed that it adds a dependency to perl.
But that shoulnd't be too much of a problem, I s'pose.
regards,
junichi
> --- pdebuild.orig 2005-10-08 10:25:12.0 +0200
> +++ pdebuild 2005-10-11 19:08:50.0 +0200
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> if ! dpkg-checkbui
Hmm.. is this patch removing -P or am I missing something?
I'd expect it to be something like
-echo "dpkg-buildpackage -S -us -uc -r${BUILDSOURCEROOTCMD} $DEBBUILDOPTS"
| perl -pe 's/(^|\s)-P(\s|$)/$1$2/g' | /bin/bash
+echo "dpkg-buildpackage -S -us -uc -r${BUILDSOURCEROOTCMD} $DEBBUILDOPT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:12:58 +0900
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm.. is this patch removing -P or am I missing something?
> I'd expect it to be something like
> -echo "dpkg-buildpackage -S -us -uc -r${BUILDSOURCEROOTCMD}
> $DEBBUIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:07:16 +0900
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that it adds a dependency to perl.
> But that shoulnd't be too much of a problem, I s'pose.
Isn't perl-base (which is required) not enough?
- Jonas
- --
*
At Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:12:58 +0900,
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> Hmm.. is this patch removing -P or am I missing something?
> I'd expect it to be something like
> -echo "dpkg-buildpackage -S -us -uc -r${BUILDSOURCEROOTCMD}
> $DEBBUILDOPTS" | perl -pe 's/(^|\s)-P(\s|$)/$1$2/g' | /bin/bash
> +
Hi,
> > Hmm.. is this patch removing -P or am I missing something?
> > I'd expect it to be something like
> > -echo "dpkg-buildpackage -S -us -uc -r${BUILDSOURCEROOTCMD}
> > $DEBBUILDOPTS" | perl -pe 's/(^|\s)-P(\s|$)/$1$2/g' | /bin/bash
> > +echo "dpkg-buildpackage -S -us -uc -r${BUILDSOU
Hi
>
> > I noticed that it adds a dependency to perl.
> > But that shoulnd't be too much of a problem, I s'pose.
>
> Isn't perl-base (which is required) not enough?
I was more worried about cost of execution.
Adding a fork to one of the more expensive programs (perl)
is sometimes worrying, bu
7 matches
Mail list logo
