Bug#312902: Missing UTF-8 locales

2005-08-02 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:09:50 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > I've checked and all localedata is available in SUPPORTED with the > > current 2.3.5-3 development in svn - it'll be OK when 2.3.5 is into > > unstable. > > According to /usr/share/i18n/locales/[EMAIL PROTECTED] files, Uzbek > language ca

Bug#312902: Missing UTF-8 locales

2005-08-02 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 04:25:22AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:36:58 +0200, > Denis Barbier wrote: > > > It would be great if all our locales support UTF-8 for etch. I'm > > > not familiar with glibc locale data, but if there's any grunt > > > work I can do to help with th

Bug#312902: Missing UTF-8 locales

2005-07-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
tags 312902 fixed-upstream thanks At Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:36:58 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > It would be great if all our locales support UTF-8 for etch. I'm > > not familiar with glibc locale data, but if there's any grunt > > work I can do to help with this, I'm very willing to assist. > > H

Bug#312902: Missing UTF-8 locales

2005-06-10 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 06:26:33PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Package: locales > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > The following locales exist in SUPPORTED, but lack a UTF-8 variant. > > aa_DJ > af_ZA > an_ES > br_FR > bs_BA > gd_GB > ka_GE > lg_UG > mi_NZ > oc_FR > om_KE > s

Bug#312902: Missing UTF-8 locales

2005-06-10 Thread Roger Leigh
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 Severity: normal Hi, The following locales exist in SUPPORTED, but lack a UTF-8 variant. aa_DJ af_ZA an_ES br_FR bs_BA gd_GB ka_GE lg_UG mi_NZ oc_FR om_KE so_DJ so_KE so_SO tg_TJ tl_PH uz_UZ yi_US zh_SG It would be great if all our locales support UTF-8 fo