Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version

On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 00:11:01 +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:55:03PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > > > > OK, I can't promise anything but I can try to prepare a 1.0.3 upload (at > > least for experimental at first). > > I just tried 1.0.3 (at last) and t

Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version

Hi, On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:55:03PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > > OK, I can't promise anything but I can try to prepare a 1.0.3 upload (at > least for experimental at first). I just tried 1.0.3 (at last) and to be honnest I am slightly disappointed. I found a few behavioral differences:

Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version

Hi, On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:24:02PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > isync 1.0.3 is available on , > with all upgrade issues that I spotted sorted out. I hope that this > version will make it into Etch. As far as I can see, Ted's last message was in july, s

Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version

On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:48:17 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > I agree that the latest isync is loads better than the old one, and so > > > if things don't work maybe we just tell people in the NEWS file that > > > it's an incompatib

Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version

On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > > I agree that the latest isync is loads better than the old one, and so > > if things don't work maybe we just tell people in the NEWS file that > > it's an incompatible upgrade, and that things will just break, or > > maybe we create

Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version

On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:00:10 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:20:22PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > > Package: isync > > Followup-For: Bug #315423 > > > > the new version seems to be very stable, and is well maintained by upstream. > > As said before, it also fixes bugs an

Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:20:22PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > Package: isync > Followup-For: Bug #315423 > > the new version seems to be very stable, and is well maintained by upstream. > As said before, it also fixes bugs and design flaws of the old version. > > Any chance to ship etch with a r

Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version

Package: isync Followup-For: Bug #315423 Hi, the new version seems to be very stable, and is well maintained by upstream. As said before, it also fixes bugs and design flaws of the old version. Any chance to ship etch with a recent isync version? I would be glad to help out testing the new packa

Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:30:00AM -0600, Hans Fugal wrote: > 1.0.1 available since March '05. 1.0.0 (beta) was a major feature > release and 1.0.1 fixes a number of bugs (and is no longer labeled > beta). Unfortunately there's not a lot of backwards compatibility between version 1.0.1 and 0.9.2.

Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version

Package: isync Version: 0.9.2-3 Severity: wishlist 1.0.1 available since March '05. 1.0.0 (beta) was a major feature release and 1.0.1 fixes a number of bugs (and is no longer labeled beta). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (800, 'unstable') Architec