On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:12:29PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> I'm fairly certain the version of fam that was installed was 2.7.0-6
> as that's the version that still has an entry in /var/lib/dpkg/status:
That settles the question then. I will prepare an upload to sarge with
the #234787 patc
On Jul 9, 2005, at 3:04 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 04:18:28PM -0700, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
There is no package version number in the bug report, but it does look
like the submitter is using testing/unstable, which means his fam
program has already been patched for #234787
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:30:10AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> AIUI, this bug is the same as bug #234787. Is that correct? If so,
> this bug is now sarge-only. Are there any plans to apply that fix for
> sarge?
There seems to be at least two problems here: one is that fam did not
stop monito
AIUI, this bug is the same as bug #234787. Is that correct? If so, this
bug is now sarge-only. Are there any plans to apply that fix for sarge?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: fam
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Fam was installed via dependancies of the gnome virtual package. Since
it was running it appears to have kept an open handle on one of my
compact flash cards when it was attached to the system and thus it was
inadvertantly re
5 matches
Mail list logo
