I tried with linux-2.6.26 from kernel.org and it works well.
Vincent
Le 3 juil. 08 à 18:14, dann frazier a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 01:12:15PM +0200, Vincent Reydet wrote:
Hi,
I've a hp netserver lc 2000 with netraid scsi card, and etch
kernel (#-6)
still doesn't work.
I've
Hi,
I've a hp netserver lc 2000 with netraid scsi card, and etch kernel
(#-6) still doesn't work.
I've installed a sarge, net upgrade to etch, then build a kernel
2.6.18-6 with the patch above ( I could share it but nobody should
trust my binary ... ).
Now it's fine for me, but i
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 01:12:15PM +0200, Vincent Reydet wrote:
Hi,
I've a hp netserver lc 2000 with netraid scsi card, and etch kernel (#-6)
still doesn't work.
I've installed a sarge, net upgrade to etch, then build a kernel 2.6.18-6
with the patch above ( I could share it but nobody
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I finally had the opportunity to reset this server, and did it on the
kernel without the patch to see the error messages.
The kernel loads, the megaraid_mbox driver detects the device, and we
have
...
Megaraid mbox : Wait for 0 commands to
[This is becoming off-topic for debian-release, and is redundant for
debian-kernel (which already receives bug traffic), so removing both
from To:]
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:50:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:03:32PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I've modified the
dann frazier a écrit :
I also wonder if all reporters mean the same thing when they say it
doesn't work? The original reporter was complaining that neither
driver claimed the card - that's no longer the case.
All users:
I'm interested in collecting the following data from each of you:
1)
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:03:32PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I've modified the patch to also blacklist these controllers in the
megaraid_mbox driver to avoid an overlap. I tested this patch on one
of the 2M cards I have (which, for whatever reason, all work just fine
with either driver).
And
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 12:16, Luk Claes wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Can you please consider fixing #317258 again? It's only about PCI ID
mappings that got lost while splitting the megaraid and megaraid_mbox
drivers. At
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:18:48PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Is there?
The patch needs to be applied upstream until it can appear again. It
moves devices between two different drivers, which obviously are not
compatible.
Both megaraid drivers looks not really good maintained.
Bastian
--
Hi,
On Friday 14 September 2007 14:57, Bastian Blank wrote:
The patch needs to be applied upstream until it can appear again.
Why?
I mean, I agree for sid, but I don't see the point in not fixing this in
stable.
Care to elaborate?
regards,
Holger
pgp8LQRCUXDLD.pgp
Description:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:10:44PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Friday 14 September 2007 14:57, Bastian Blank wrote:
The patch needs to be applied upstream until it can appear again.
Why?
I mean, I agree for sid, but I don't see the point in not fixing this in
stable.
Care to
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:53:50AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Have you verified that this fix works in 2.6.18? It seems like its
adding support for megaraid3s w/ specific subsystem devices, while
2.6.18 (and current upstream) claim megaraid3 devices w/ *any*
subsystem ids. (Although there does
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:12:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:53:50AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Have you verified that this fix works in 2.6.18? It seems like its
adding support for megaraid3s w/ specific subsystem devices, while
2.6.18 (and current upstream)
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this looks correct, I'll submit it upstream and then we can
look at backporting it into a stable update.
It looks like you've defined the HP_NETRAID[12]M_SUBSYS_DID constansts
however forgot to change to code to use them and on the if you use the
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this looks correct, I'll submit it upstream and then we can
look at backporting it into a stable update.
It looks like you've defined the HP_NETRAID[12]M_SUBSYS_DID constansts
however forgot to change to
15 matches
Mail list logo
