On Aug 02, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the bug still exists in sid: the package fails installing when running
> anything but a kernel < 2.6.12 and upgrading from the sarge/etch version
> (<< 0.60). maybe udev should not run on these kernels (the init script
> checks the kernel too),
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:08:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:17:38AM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > But the package is not *in* etch, so the fact that it's uninstallable in
> > > etch is not groun
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:17:38AM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But the package is not *in* etch, so the fact that it's uninstallable in
> > etch is not grounds for a grave bug.
> sorry, i miss the reasonning. does the fact that
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> But the package is not *in* etch, so the fact that it's uninstallable in
> etch is not grounds for a grave bug.
sorry, i miss the reasonning. does the fact that this version is broken
grounds for an open bug, or should all sid-only
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 06:26:44PM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 06:01:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Aug 01, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > as you say, the working solution is not yet. the bug should remain open.
> > There is nothing to be solve
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 06:01:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 01, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > as you say, the working solution is not yet. the bug should remain open.
> There is nothing to be solved. Recent udev releaes require a modern
> kernel. If you disagree with my
reopen 317332
thanks
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:35:03PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 01, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Marco, please explain us verbosely why a package that breaks upgrades,
> > leaves other packages unconfigured, and prevents installation on systems
> > ot
reopen 317332
thanks
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:57:51AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> So it's working as designed.
> If you want to use a newer udev you need a newer kernel.
Marco, please explain us verbosely why a package that breaks upgrades,
leaves other packages unconfigured, and prevents inst
reopen 317332
thanks
i don't have it installed:
Preparing to replace udev 0.056-3 (using .../udev_0.063-1_powerpc.deb) ...
udev requires a kernel >= 2.6.12, upgrade aborted.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.063-1_powerpc.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script re
9 matches
Mail list logo
