On Fri 01 Dec 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
Also, I tried to backport it to sarge (where I urgently need it)
but didn't succeed because of many compile time errors. :-(
How did you try to build it?
apt-get source rsync
cd rsync-2.6.9
dpkg-buildpackage -uc -m[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aiii,
Hi Paul,
There's a prerelease of 2.6.9 uploaded to experimental, 2.6.9~pre3-1
It also has ACL support patched in.
Thanks for the note. I am out of town for a while (actually out of
continent :-) so I didn't check until just now.
I found 2.6.9-2 on unstable, but I don't see any mentioning of
Hi Paul,
Also, I tried to backport it to sarge (where I urgently need it)
but didn't succeed because of many compile time errors. :-(
How did you try to build it?
apt-get source rsync
cd rsync-2.6.9
dpkg-buildpackage -uc -m[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aiii, I forgot the -B and therefore didn't
On Thu 21 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
A 2.6.9 version of rsync is imminent
Great. Would you mind sending a mail (and to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
when it's available?
There's a prerelease of 2.6.9 uploaded to experimental, 2.6.9~pre3-1
It also has ACL support patched in.
Paul Slootman
--
To
Whoops! Please send over a large trout, I must be confused by the
bugs :)
No problem. You can make up for it by backporting it again :)))
Are there any plans for a new backport?
Hm, actually I wonder whether the patch even made it into sid yet.
Does anyone know?
Thanks,
Andy.
--
You
On Thu 21 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
Hm, actually I wonder whether the patch even made it into sid yet.
A 2.6.9 version of rsync is imminent, and should have that fix (and a couple
of other important fixes) in it, so I prefer to wait a bit for that.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Wonderful!
When can we expect the Debian package to include this patch?
(especially the backported version would be greeeat)
Thanks,
Andy.
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
Ah, I got a prompt answer from Wayne on the rsync list. I'll attach it.
[...]
This is a different bug that was
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 19:28 +0200, Andy Spiegl wrote:
When can we expect the Debian package to include this patch?
(especially the backported version would be greeeat)
I backported it a long time ago, I thought it was referenced in this bug
thread? Anyway, you can pick up the package here
Whoops! Please send over a large trout, I must be confused by the
bugs :)
No problem. You can make up for it by backporting it again :)))
Andy.
--
Many people easily confuse innovation with the latest
influenza epidemia from Redmond.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi Serge,
I backported it a long time ago, I thought it was referenced in this bug
thread? Anyway, you can pick up the package here
deb http://www.vanginderachter.be/downloads/debian/packages/archives sarge
main
Wonderful! However... your last changelog.Debian entry was in
September
Wonderful! However... your last changelog.Debian entry was in
September 2005, and the patch is from 2006-08-26.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929
So somehow I doubt that you already included that patch. :-)
Whoops! Please send over a large trout, I must be confused by the
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug report
Huh? This should be very simple reproducible by just following the
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-April/012335.html
And yes, with the current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
On 9-Sep-06, at 9:32 AM, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug
report
I was able to reproduce this bug with the
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:57:34AM -0400, Simon Boulet wrote:
On 9-Sep-06, at 9:32 AM, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug
report
I was able to reproduce this bug
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 03:32:08PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
However, unfortunately it's not fully fixed either :/
I just stumbled over it while noticing that my rsnapshot root backup
never gets any file deleted...
Ah, I got a prompt answer from Wayne on the rsync list. I'll attach
Hi, I just stumpled over this same bug. :-(
My backup disks were spilling because rsync never deleted files!
Unfortunately the patch provided by Serge doesn't work
when rsync connects to an rsync-server. In that case
the --delete option STILL doesn't work as expected.
Leaving off the trailing
On Fri 01 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
Hi, I just stumpled over this same bug. :-(
My backup disks were spilling because rsync never deleted files!
Unfortunately the patch provided by Serge doesn't work
when rsync connects to an rsync-server. In that case
the --delete option STILL
... and has been fixed, in testing and unstable, for about just as long.
Even in combination when connecting to a rsync server?
But then why is the bug report still open?
stable is called stable because it basically doesn't change.
Security fixes make it to point releases, but not simple bug
On Fri 01 Sep 2006, Andy Spiegl wrote:
... and has been fixed, in testing and unstable, for about just as long.
Even in combination when connecting to a rsync server?
But then why is the bug report still open?
Because I couldn't reproduce it, and I didn't want to close a bug report
I had not
In can meanwhile confirm that this update also solves the problem in
rsnapshot. Upstream has also been updated on this.
Is there any way where this patch could go into Sarge?
--
Serge van Ginderachter
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
I can confirm that the bug is solved with the patch earlier
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-April/012338.html
I updated the Sarge package - rsync version 2.6.4-6 with it and
testrunned it using the --delete option, which works as expected.
'rsync_2.6.4-6.svg1_i386.deb' and
21 matches
Mail list logo
