On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:01:27AM +, Martin Guy wrote:
2006/10/27, Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am building for the forthcoming armel architecture, and I too needed
to add an arch to the control file. Is there any reason not to simply
make this any rather than have to change it every
2006/10/27, Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am building for the forthcoming armel architecture, and I too needed
to add an arch to the control file. Is there any reason not to simply
make this any rather than have to change it every time a new arch is
made? None of the mainline arches are
I am building for the forthcoming armel architecture, and I too needed
to add an arch to the control file. Is there any reason not to simply
make this any rather than have to change it every time a new arch is
made? None of the mainline arches are missing, and a huge selection of
unofficial ones
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 02:44:55PM +0100, Martin Guy wrote:
I am building for the forthcoming armel architecture, and I too needed
to add an arch to the control file. Is there any reason not to simply
make this any rather than have to change it every time a new arch is
made?
hurd-i386
4 matches
Mail list logo
