On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:44:13PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
(which is extracted from GPL?) should be fixed, since the user
doesn't generally recognises that this is an excerpt of GPL and
translation refers to translations of GPL.
No, the above quoted text is *not* extracted from
Hi,
Before discussion details of words, I would say for all practical
purpose, let's drop GFDL statement from comments. When newbie document
people (GFDL) was active, I thouhjt they may overtake my documents and
include portions with GFDL. That is not the case. Also GPL is better
and I like
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:07:01 +0200 Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
Before discussion details of words, I would say for all practical
purpose, let's drop GFDL statement from comments.
Good! :)
[...]
I think this GPL statemnt may come from older version. I did not
create it. Instead of arguing how
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:05:32 +0200 Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 09:47:34PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
The work is thus released under the GNU GPL (v2 or later),
Yes absolutely.
Wonderful! :)
but some phrases
taken from a different license seem to have leaked
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 09:47:34PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
Package: debian-reference-common
Version: 1.08-3
Severity: minor
Hi, I am back on net now :-)
Debian-reference copyright notice reads:
This document may used under the terms the GNU General Public License
version 2 or
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 05:05:32PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 09:47:34PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
Debian-reference copyright notice reads:
This document may used under the terms the GNU General Public License
version 2 or higher.
[snip]
[See
Package: debian-reference-common
Version: 1.08-3
Severity: minor
Hi!
Debian-reference copyright notice reads:
This document may used under the terms the GNU General Public License
version 2 or higher.
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
this document
7 matches
Mail list logo
