Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 9/7/05, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
The problem is that the patch was applied brokenly on apt-zip's code
(I guess you took parts of it).
The formatting is messed up in the wget method and the generated
scripts; the patch I prop
On 9/7/05, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > Hello Giacomo,
> >
> > I have observed that you have applied a part of my patch to apt-zip
> > 0.13.3. Thanks for that.
>
> It seems that you have lost my previous mail ;-)
Probably... sorry
> > The problem is
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Hello Giacomo,
>
> I have observed that you have applied a part of my patch to apt-zip
> 0.13.3. Thanks for that.
It seems that you have lost my previous mail ;-)
>
> The problem is that the patch was applied brokenly on apt-zip's code
> (I guess you took parts of it).
>
>
Hello Giacomo,
I have observed that you have applied a part of my patch to apt-zip
0.13.3. Thanks for that.
The problem is that the patch was applied brokenly on apt-zip's code
(I guess you took parts of it).
The formatting is messed up in the wget method and the generated
scripts; the patch I p
4 matches
Mail list logo