Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Maybe we have a design flaw here in our updmap-magic scheme. Just that
>> it should have revealed itself earlier.
>
> Nope. :)
>
>> Here, tetex-base, tetex-bin and tetex-extra are upgraded in the same
>> ap
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe we have a design flaw here in our updmap-magic scheme. Just that
> it should have revealed itself earlier.
Nope. :)
> Here, tetex-base, tetex-bin and tetex-extra are upgraded in the same
> apt-get run, and they are configured in the order tetex-
--- Begin Message ---
Frank Küster schrieb am 03.08.2005 10:44:
> Christoph Bier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>This file shouldn't exist (neither in tetex-2.0.2 nor in 3.0).
>>
>>This Debian box has also seen tetex-1 ...
>
> But dpkg should have removed old files in /usr/share...
I guess ther
Frank Küster schrieb am 03.08.2005 10:45:
> Christoph,
>
> please send mails to the bug address, so that they get properly
> archived.
Oh sorry! I just pressed 'reply' ... The same for my last reply :-/.
I'll send it again to the bug address.
>
Christoph,
please send mails to the bug address, so that they get properly
archived.
TIA, Frank
--- Begin Message ---
Frank Küster schrieb am 02.08.2005 19:57:
> I'm in a hurry, therefore only very short.
>
> Christoph Bier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Subject: tetex-bin: Updmap error bec
5 matches
Mail list logo
