On Tue, Jan 29, 2008, Clint Adams wrote:
Using such an umask causes problems, and bash ships with an
/etc/skel/.bashrc which sets the umask to 022.
This is not the case anymore; umask is set in /etc/profile. The
rationale is in bug #155973 where it's proposed that this prevent
sysadmins
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:23:23PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Using such an umask causes problems, and bash ships with an
/etc/skel/.bashrc which sets the umask to 022.
I'm well aware that it might not be a zsh bug, still the fact is that
switching from the default shell to zsh can bring
On 30 Sep, Clint Adams wrote:
I'll put umask 022 in /etc/skel/.zshrc, I suppose.
It would be better to put that in one of zprofile or zlogin. It is
exported to child processes and it could be a nuisance (or even a security
risk) if child shells override the setting.
Oliver
This e-mail and
What do you think of this issue? Should this be mandated by
debian-policy? Do you want me to bring the discussion to
debian-policy?
I'll put umask 022 in /etc/skel/.zshrc, I suppose.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
On mer, aoû 03, 2005, Loïc Minier wrote:
I just did a fresh installation and dist-upgrade to sid, switched to
zsh as login shell for root and myself, and the default umask has
changed. It used to be 022 and is now 077.
What do you think of this issue? Should this be mandated
Package: zsh
Version: 4.2.5-10
Severity: important
Hi,
I just did a fresh installation and dist-upgrade to sid, switched to
zsh as login shell for root and myself, and the default umask has
changed. It used to be 022 and is now 077.
I think the relevant change is in the default
6 matches
Mail list logo
