On 22.08.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > I guess
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-tetex-maint/2004/03/msg00181.html
>
> Yes, indeed. Maybe even put that URL into the text.
>
suggestion attached.
> > I try to write an entry for R
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-tetex-maint/2004/03/msg00181.html
Yes, indeed. Maybe even put that URL into the text.
> I try to write an entry for Readme.Debian for that. Should we put it
> into News.Debian instead or will it not be displaye
On 14.08.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 04.08.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> >> libkpathsea4 or rather libkpathsea4-dev should have a
> >> README.Debian that explains the reasons for the soname change
> >>
> > Why?
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04.08.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> libkpathsea4 or rather libkpathsea4-dev should have a README.Debian
>> that explains the reasons for the soname change
>>
> Why? Did Thomas/Olaf give a exact reason, why they did that? Do
On 04.08.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> libkpathsea4 or rather libkpathsea4-dev should have a README.Debian
> that explains the reasons for the soname change
>
Why? Did Thomas/Olaf give a exact reason, why they did that? Do
really anybody has to explain, why the soname was chan
Package: libkpathsea4-dev
Version: 3.0-5.0.sarge1
Severity: normal
libkpathsea4 or rather libkpathsea4-dev should have a README.Debian that
explains the reasons for the soname change
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: [EMAIL PR
6 matches
Mail list logo