On 9/27/05, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 18:54 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
>
> > The gimp is currently broken as well. It can't save PNG images.
> > In the xterm I started gimp from, I get this:
>
> > libpng error: Call to NULL write function
>
> I h
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 09:13 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Gee, I don't know. It's a mess:
>
> libpng12-dev 1.2.8rel-1
> libpng12-01.2.8rel-1
Those are the ones.
Upgrade to anything >= 1.2.8rel-1.0.1 and gimp/imagemagick will work.
But at the same time, pdflatex won't work
So, here's a ta
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 09:13 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
>
>> Gee, I don't know. It's a mess:
>>
>> libpng12-dev 1.2.8rel-1
>> libpng12-01.2.8rel-1
>
> Those are the ones.
> Upgrade to anything >= 1.2.8rel-1.0.1 and gimp/imagemagick will work.
> Bu
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 16:19 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Interesting. What happens if you recompile tetex-bin with
> libpng12-0 >= *-1.0.1?
It works, but IIRC I only tried -1.0.1 and -2.
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
I'm trying to compile Enlightenment from CVS-sources for some time
now, and I get png-related errors. Additionally, I compiled a small
image viewer called "qiv" that is unable to handle pngs correctly,
too.
Using a X-remote session with Enlightenment from Unstable as the WM, I
noticed that som
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 16:19 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Interesting. What happens if you recompile tetex-bin with
>> libpng12-0 >= *-1.0.1?
>
> It works, but IIRC I only tried -1.0.1 and -2.
Well, I think it's clear: We need a binary-only upload
> Well, I think it's clear: We need a binary-only upload of tetex-bin.
> I've never done that on one of the developer machines; is there any DD
> on the powerpc list who is willing to save me from learning ;-)?
To be safe, do everything that depends on the library.
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 16:54 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Well, I think it's clear: We need a binary-only upload of tetex-bin.
> I've never done that on one of the developer machines; is there any DD
> on the powerpc list who is willing to save me from learning ;-)?
Yeah, but why did this happen
* Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-19 14:08]:
> After discussing with the submitter, it looks like tetex-bin needs a
> rebuild as well. A binary-only upload on powerpc should do the trick.
* Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-06 19:02]:
> So it seems we can close this bug, than
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-14 11:25]:
> I just upgraded libpng but I still see the bug. So maybe tetex-bin
> needs to be binNMUed on powerpc as Josselin suggested.
Recompiling tetex-bin indeed works; I'll upload a binNMU.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To U
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-14 11:25]:
>> I just upgraded libpng but I still see the bug. So maybe tetex-bin
>> needs to be binNMUed on powerpc as Josselin suggested.
>
> Recompiling tetex-bin indeed works; I'll upload a binNMU.
A
reassign 322821 tetex-bin
severity 322821 important
merge 322821 327082
thanks
Le vendredi 12 août 2005 à 22:55 +0200, Johannes Berg a écrit :
> Package: libpng12-0
> Version: 1.2.8rel-1.0.1
> Severity: normal
>
> After installing the latest version of libpng12-0, pdflatex no longer works,
> outp
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reassign 322821 tetex-bin
> severity 322821 important
> merge 322821 327082
> thanks
>
[...]
> After discussing with the submitter, it looks like tetex-bin needs a
> rebuild as well. A binary-only upload on powerpc should do the trick.
I might out mys
Le lundi 26 septembre 2005 à 15:20 +0200, Frank Küster a écrit :
> > After discussing with the submitter, it looks like tetex-bin needs a
> > rebuild as well. A binary-only upload on powerpc should do the trick.
>
> I might out myself as a complete ignorant in terms of libraries, but
> this seems
Hi Powerpc people,
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lundi 26 septembre 2005 à 15:20 +0200, Frank Küster a écrit :
>> > After discussing with the submitter, it looks like tetex-bin needs a
>> > rebuild as well. A binary-only upload on powerpc should do the trick.
>>
>> I might out
> To sum things up: An update of libpng has caused tetex-bin (actually the
> pdftex binary) to fail when including a png image. Since we (teTeX
> maintainers) made no changes, we suspected that it's a change in libpng,
> but there were no changes that could cause this, either.
The gimp is current
Package: libpng12-0
Version: 1.2.8rel-1.0.1
Severity: normal
After installing the latest version of libpng12-0, pdflatex no longer works,
output is:
[...]
loading : Context Support Macros / PDF
) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/nameref.sty) (./document.out)
(./document.out)
[1{/var/lib/texm
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:58:01AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Being from EBCDIC land, s390 probably also has an unsigned char by default.
> (dang this is dumb - all Linux ports should use the same default)
arm also uses unsigned char by default. I have had to fix a few things
because of that
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 18:54 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
>
>> The gimp is currently broken as well. It can't save PNG images.
>> In the xterm I started gimp from, I get this:
>
>> libpng error: Call to NULL write function
>
> I had that proble
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 17:48 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 16:54 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >
> >> Well, I think it's clear: We need a binary-only upload of tetex-bin.
> >> I've never done that on one of the developer machine
On 9/27/05, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 18:54 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> >
> >> The gimp is currently broken as well. It can't save PNG images.
> >> In the xterm I started gimp from, I get this:
> >
> >>
Hi Ryan, hi s390 people,
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 16:54 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Well, I think it's clear: We need a binary-only upload of tetex-bin.
>> I've never done that on one of the developer machines; is there any DD
>> on the powerpc list wh
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:58:01AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Alignment seems to be the same between ppc and i386. (not that I would
> know or care about bitfields)
alignment for 64bit integer types is not the same for i386 vs everything
else.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Recompiling the packages against the new version helps, and I'm looking
> for someone to make bin-NMUs of tetex-bin. gs-gpl still seems to be
> affected, too
I've gone ahead and made a bin-NMU for ppc to fix this bug since it
was affecting me... I've no
24 matches
Mail list logo
