On 23.08.05 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Die, 23 Aug 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
> > I'm not even sure how this could happen. The history went as follows:
>
> Hmm. It is not necessarily a format created by tetex, maybe
> someone/something put it there even some time *befor
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster schrieb am Wed 24. Aug, 11:57 (+0200):
>> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Das hast du selber gemacht, oder? Was wolltest du damit erreichen? Es
>> > ist nicht sinnvoll und bringt die Reihenfolge der TEXMF-Bäume
>> > durcheina
Frank Küster schrieb am Wed 24. Aug, 11:57 (+0200):
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Das hast du selber gemacht, oder? Was wolltest du damit erreichen? Es
> > ist nicht sinnvoll und bringt die Reihenfolge der TEXMF-Bäume
> > durcheinander; es ist der Grund, warum die alten Formate
On Mit, 24 Aug 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > This is ok for you:
>
> Looks good.
Submitted together with changelog entries.
> > And if yes, what is your timeline for uploading a new version to
> > unstable (new version of tex-common)?
>
> Doing the test runs for tex-common is quite fast, since
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Die, 23 Aug 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>> We should probably rename fmtutil.cnf and updmap.cfg, too, if they are
>
> This is ok for you:
Looks good.
> And if yes, what is your timeline for uploading a new version to
> unstable (new version of tex-c
On Die, 23 Aug 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> We should probably rename fmtutil.cnf and updmap.cfg, too, if they are
This is ok for you:
And if yes, what is your timeline for uploading a new version to
unstable (new version of tex-common)?
I want to time this with the new version of the texlive pac
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Das hast du selber gemacht, oder? Was wolltest du damit erreichen? Es
> ist nicht sinnvoll und bringt die Reihenfolge der TEXMF-Bäume
> durcheinander; es ist der Grund, warum die alten Formate in
> /usr/share/texmf/web2c überhaupt gefunden wurden.
Uups.
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> grep -A 1 -B 9 '^[[:space:]]*TEXMFCONFIG' /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf
>
> % TEXMFCONFIG, where texconfig stores configuration data.
> % With teTeX-3.0 or later, this must be set.
> % For sharing this tree with $TEXMFMAIN:
> % TEXMFCONFIG = $TEXMFMAIN
Frank Küster schrieb am Tue 23. Aug, 16:43 (+0200):
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frank Küster schrieb am Tue 23. Aug, 12:37 (+0200):
> >> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > You have a stroke of luck, I saved a copy of it. Yes it was a generated
> >> > file and as
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster schrieb am Tue 23. Aug, 12:37 (+0200):
>> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > You have a stroke of luck, I saved a copy of it. Yes it was a generated
>> > file and as you can see in the other mail it was touched today. If I see
>> >
Frank Küster schrieb am Tue 23. Aug, 12:37 (+0200):
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You have a stroke of luck, I saved a copy of it. Yes it was a generated
> > file and as you can see in the other mail it was touched today. If I see
> > it right, this was after the reinstall (purge)
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +#
> +# remove left over fmt/efmt/log files in /usr/share/texmf/web2c/
> +#
> +if [ -d /usr/share/texmf/web2c ] ; then
> + rm -rf /usr/share/texmf/web2c/*.fmt
> + rm -rf /usr/share/texmf/web2c/*.efmt
> + rm -rf /usr/share/texmf/web2
On Die, 23 Aug 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> I'm not even sure how this could happen. The history went as follows:
Hmm. It is not necessarily a format created by tetex, maybe
someone/something put it there even some time *before* installation
tetex etc.
> What about putting this into tex-common?
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 20:50 (+0200):
>> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > config file: `/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg'
>>
>> This file shouldn't be there. You are now the third person who has it,
>> although to our knowl
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Die, 23 Aug 2005, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Because it was a fault of me, we should close this bug report. What do
>> you think?
>
> Well, we should be sure that old .fmt/.efmt are definitely removed.
> Otherwise this will happend again.
I'm not even s
On Die, 23 Aug 2005, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Because it was a fault of me, we should close this bug report. What do
> you think?
Well, we should be sure that old .fmt/.efmt are definitely removed.
Otherwise this will happend again.
Probably something like adding in the postinst of tetex-base 3.0 a
c
Frank Küster schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 20:50 (+0200):
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > config file: `/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg'
>
> This file shouldn't be there. You are now the third person who has it,
> although to our knowledge none of the older Debian packages ever plac
Frank Küster schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 19:57 (+0200):
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > This is METAFONT, Version 2.71828 (Web2C 7.5.4)
> >> > (Fatal base file error; I'm stymied)
> >>
> >> The next one...
> >>
> >> $ kpsewhich --format=fmt mf.base
> >
> > /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mf
Hi,
Before closing down my mail program I just notice that there is this
unsent mail. Most of it is probably outdated after the various mails we
exchanged this afternoon, but other things might be still interesting.
And I'm simply too much in a hurry to go through it again.
Regards, Frank
Jörg
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > This is METAFONT, Version 2.71828 (Web2C 7.5.4)
>> > (Fatal base file error; I'm stymied)
>>
>> The next one...
>>
>> $ kpsewhich --format=fmt mf.base
>
> /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mf.base
It should be (and probably is...) in /var/lib/texmf/web2c/ (since
Frank Küster schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 16:54 (+0200):
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It still does not work and I found these two files in my filesystem for
> > which dpkg has no owner. I removed them and run dpkg-reconfigure
> > tetex-bin. Now latex works, but prints the same error
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It still does not work and I found these two files in my filesystem for
> which dpkg has no owner. I removed them and run dpkg-reconfigure
> tetex-bin. Now latex works, but prints the same error message as pdflatex
Which files where they, and were?
> $ la
Norbert Preining schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 15:40 (+0200):
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > ... mf-nowin
> > This is METAFONT, Version 2.71828 (Web2C 7.5.4)
> > (Fatal base file error; I'm stymied)
>
> > $ latex test.latex
> > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4)
> >
Jörg Sommer schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 13:30 (+0200):
> Frank Küster schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 12:35 (+0200):
> > Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > updmap fails while installing the package which causes the whole package
> > > installation fails.
> >
> > Does the updmap error now still
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> ... mf-nowin
> This is METAFONT, Version 2.71828 (Web2C 7.5.4)
> (Fatal base file error; I'm stymied)
> $ latex test.latex
> This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4)
> (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied)
That this happens *after* you h
Frank Küster schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 13:58 (+0200):
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frank Küster schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 12:35 (+0200):
> >> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > updmap fails while installing the package which causes the whole package
> >> > installati
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 12:35 (+0200):
>> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > updmap fails while installing the package which causes the whole package
>> > installation fails.
>>
>> Does the updmap error now still occur, or is it f
Frank Küster schrieb am Mon 22. Aug, 12:35 (+0200):
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > updmap fails while installing the package which causes the whole package
> > installation fails.
>
> Does the updmap error now still occur, or is it fixed too? If not,
I've "purged" all tetex pack
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> updmap fails while installing the package which causes the whole package
> installation fails.
As reported in bug #323826, there was an other error during the
installation. This gave a buggy texmf.cnf file, and you said that you
have now manuall fixed tha
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
updmap fails while installing the package which causes the whole package
installation fails.
Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ...
updmap failed. Output has been stored in
[...]
updmap: Scanning for Map entries:
updmap: using map
30 matches
Mail list logo
