Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't that indicate that libpam-ldap *does* have an appropriate
> versioned dependency, which you violated by versioning your local
> package with an epoch that's not present in the Debian archive?
Probably.
> The shlibs system of shared library hand
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:56:48PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> Ah, ha! It turns out that this bug is because libpam-ldap in sarge
> doesn't have appropriate versioned dependencies on libldap2. I had
> recompiled the openldap2 libraries and server on woody to enable SSL
> support way back when.
Ah, ha! It turns out that this bug is because libpam-ldap in sarge
doesn't have appropriate versioned dependencies on libldap2. I had
recompiled the openldap2 libraries and server on woody to enable SSL
support way back when. Because I used an epoch in the version, it never
got upgraded with the
Package: libpam-ldap
Version: 178-1sarge1
arch:i386
After having installed the security related package libpam-ldap 178-1sarge1
I receive the following error messages (on a file server running samba):
Aug 26 10:22:35 emlsv22 smbd[3566]: PAM adding faulty module:
/lib/security/pam_ldap.so
4 matches
Mail list logo
