On Monday 05 September 2005 17:04, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:28:03PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
(actually the distinction between 'multi-user without network' and
'multi-user with network' is more interesting to me: booting a laptop
without netwerk easily
On Friday 02 September 2005 19:35, Bill Allombert wrote:
Yes, it works while the RH/MDK/SuSE implementation does not.
On Debian at least you do not need to mess with /etc/inittab each time
you install/remove a display manager.
How do you plan to fix that while keeping the admin free to change
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:28:03PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2005 19:35, Bill Allombert wrote:
Yes, it works while the RH/MDK/SuSE implementation does not.
On Debian at least you do not need to mess with /etc/inittab each time
you install/remove a
On Friday 02 September 2005 03:21, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
Yes, a technical one. Given that the recommended way to call
update-rc.d is currently using the argument defaults, achiving the
granularity described in to document above would require modifying all
packages calling update-rc.d .
that's
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:03:27PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2005 02:42, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:09:46AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Debian doesn't enforce a policy on the multi-user run-levels (2-5), this
is the decision of the
On Monday 29 August 2005 02:42, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:09:46AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Debian doesn't enforce a policy on the multi-user run-levels (2-5), this
is the decision of the local administrator.
I agree that not enforcing a policy on run-levels is fine, the
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:03:27PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2005 02:42, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:09:46AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Debian doesn't enforce a policy on the multi-user run-levels (2-5), this
is the decision of the local
B Debian doesn't enforce a policy on the multi-user run-levels (2-5), this
B is the decision of the local administrator.
OK, it wouldn't hurt to mention that fact then in the policy document,
just to make things clear. Or maybe it would hurt. I don't know.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:33:14AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
B Debian doesn't enforce a policy on the multi-user run-levels (2-5), this
B is the decision of the local administrator.
OK, it wouldn't hurt to mention that fact then in the policy document,
just to make things clear. Or maybe it
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.2.1
Severity: wishlist
One wants to know the exact definition of each of the Debian run levels.
We see
9.3. System run levels and `init.d' scripts
9.3.1. Introduction
The `/etc/init.d' directory contains the scripts executed by `init' at
boot
10 matches
Mail list logo
