On 08.09.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi *,
I'm sending this mail to you since you are listed at the bottom of the
last build log of tetex-bin on powerpc (on voltaire).
snip
Or that the build environment is/was screwed on voltaire. Do you
have any indications for this?
On 07.09.05 Wolfram Quester ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:48:30PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...snip...]
This trace doesn't say anything about png.
ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1.0.1 PNG library -
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:47:32PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Wolfram Quester wrote:
The file is attached.
Thanks. I can't offer a solution right now, but two possible workarounds:
* The images looks as if it is created in a vector-graphics application
like xfig. In that case you
Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I know this workaround and I'm using it ATM. Does this mean that you
can reproduce this bug with the image I sent you in?
I can reproduce it on powerpc on sid, not on sarge (in the etch chroot
on bruckner, no tetex is installed, so I can' test.)
Hi again,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I know this workaround and I'm using it ATM. Does this mean that you
can reproduce this bug with the image I sent you in?
I can reproduce it on powerpc on sid, not on
Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I know this workaround and I'm using it ATM. Does this mean that you
can reproduce this bug with the image I sent you in?
I
On 08.09.05 Wolfram Quester ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
I can reproduce it on powerpc on sid, not on sarge (in the etch
chroot on bruckner, no tetex is installed, so I can' test.)
BTW, I noticed that tetex-extra does not
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:22:44PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...snip...]
OK, I rebuilt tetex-bin and tetex-base 3.0-7 from experimental, then I
installed the produced packages. And voilà, I can include png files
again. From the debugging so far I
On 08.09.05 Wolfram Quester ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:22:44PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
OK, I rebuilt tetex-bin and tetex-base 3.0-7 from experimental,
then I installed the produced packages. And voilà, I can
Hi Ryan,
I'm sending this mail to you since you are listed at the bottom of the
last build log of tetex-bin on powerpc (on voltaire).
OK, I rebuilt tetex-bin and tetex-base 3.0-7 from experimental,
then I installed the produced packages. And voilà, I can
include png files again. From
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-31
Severity: important
Hi,
in former times I could use a line like
\includegraphics[height=0.3\textheight]{pics/VDE}
and latex would choose the right file (.eps for latex, .png for
pdflatex).
Now pdflatex detects correctly that it should include the .png, but
Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now pdflatex detects correctly that it should include the .png, but
segfaults:
pics/VDE.png, id=37, 584.1825pt x 651.43375pt use pics/VDE.png
Overfull \hbox (11.3373pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 153--174
[]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/(Historical no-te:
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:48:30PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...snip...]
This trace doesn't say anything about png.
ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1.0.1 PNG library - runtime
That's the same version as in
Wolfram Quester wrote:
The file is attached.
Thanks. I can't offer a solution right now, but two possible workarounds:
* The images looks as if it is created in a vector-graphics application
like xfig. In that case you could either directly produce a PDF image
from the drawing application or
14 matches
Mail list logo
