-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:54:45PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Can you please confirm that the reason why libcommoncpp2 failed has
nothing to do with the buildd or otherwise reschedule libcommoncpp2?
Doesn't look like it's a
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 07:04:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:54:45PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Can you please confirm that the reason why libcommoncpp2 failed has
nothing to do with the buildd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Can you please confirm that the reason why libcommoncpp2 failed has
nothing to do with the buildd or otherwise reschedule libcommoncpp2?
Please keep me posted.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:54:45PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Can you please confirm that the reason why libcommoncpp2 failed has
nothing to do with the buildd or otherwise reschedule libcommoncpp2?
Doesn't look like it's a buildd problem. Bug in debhelper perhaps?
--
The amount of time between
4 matches
Mail list logo