Bug#328067: libcommoncpp2

2005-10-07 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:54:45PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Can you please confirm that the reason why libcommoncpp2 failed has nothing to do with the buildd or otherwise reschedule libcommoncpp2? Doesn't look like it's a

Bug#328067: libcommoncpp2

2005-10-07 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 07:04:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:54:45PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Can you please confirm that the reason why libcommoncpp2 failed has nothing to do with the buildd

Bug#328067: libcommoncpp2

2005-10-05 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Can you please confirm that the reason why libcommoncpp2 failed has nothing to do with the buildd or otherwise reschedule libcommoncpp2? Please keep me posted. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

Bug#328067: libcommoncpp2

2005-10-05 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:54:45PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Can you please confirm that the reason why libcommoncpp2 failed has nothing to do with the buildd or otherwise reschedule libcommoncpp2? Doesn't look like it's a buildd problem. Bug in debhelper perhaps? -- The amount of time between