Bug#328411: note

2006-08-12 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 07:40:54PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:37:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: is one, it could be a possibility, except for systems that don't support the ondemand governor. Are there any such systems? Yes. Ondemand only works if the CPU

Bug#328411: note

2006-08-07 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:54:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I'm leaving this bug open targeted at including a cpu frequcny scaling daemon in the laptop task. Choosing between the three is difficult, and an added problem is that currently 2 of the 3 don't automatically load the kernel modules.

Bug#328411: note

2006-08-07 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:37:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I don't care if it's a daemon, but I don't know of any package that just loads the right cpufreq modules and gets out of the way either. If there is one, it could be a possibility, except for systems that don't support the ondemand

Bug#328411: note

2006-08-07 Thread Joey Hess
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:54:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I'm leaving this bug open targeted at including a cpu frequcny scaling daemon in the laptop task. Choosing between the three is difficult, and an added problem is that currently 2 of the 3 don't

Bug#328411: note

2006-06-18 Thread Joey Hess
I'm leaving this bug open targeted at including a cpu frequcny scaling daemon in the laptop task. Choosing between the three is difficult, and an added problem is that currently 2 of the 3 don't automatically load the kernel modules. I'm leaning toward powernowd, if #367307 can get fixed. -- see