Bug#328707: partial patch

2005-09-21 Thread Joey Hess
Here's the best patch I've been able to find for this so far. -- see shy jo --- linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.seg2005-03-27 13:10:45.0 -0800 +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c2005-03-28 10:30:24.0 -0800 @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ extern int (*console_blank_hook)(int); * Save a

Bug#328707: partial patch

2005-09-21 Thread Horms
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:10:10AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: > Here's the best patch I've been able to find for this so far. This is completely weird, any ideas why this hasn't shown up before? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Bug#328707: partial patch

2005-09-22 Thread Joey Hess
Horms wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:10:10AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: > > Here's the best patch I've been able to find for this so far. > > This is completely weird, any ideas why this hasn't shown up before? Apparently it's known breakage caused by the new binutils that I guess only just rea

Bug#328707: partial patch

2005-09-22 Thread Horms
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: > Horms wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:10:10AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Here's the best patch I've been able to find for this so far. > > > > This is completely weird, any ideas why this hasn't shown up before? > > Apparently

Bug#328707: partial patch

2005-09-22 Thread Joey Hess
Horms wrote: > Ok, that makes sense. Let me know if the build completes and if so > I'll add it to the tree. Build completed. Kernel seems ok. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#328707: partial patch

2005-09-25 Thread Horms
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 11:08:39AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote: > Horms wrote: > > Ok, that makes sense. Let me know if the build completes and if so > > I'll add it to the tree. > > Build completed. Kernel seems ok. Thanks, I put your fix into the tree, it seems to be upstream, but looks like it was