Package: fonttools
Version: 1.99+2.0b1+cvs20031014-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

I've updated fonttools to a new upstream version from CVS. The diff.gz
is attached, and the changelog is as follows. It fixes all the bugs
filed against the debian package and is linda/lintian clean.

fonttools (1.99+2.0b1+cvs20050223-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release (CVS from 2005-02-23)
    - Drop patches (everything included upstream)
    - Fixes traceback for newer OS/2 tables (Closes: #306287)
  * Update Standards-Version (no changes)
  * Include ttx manpage from Florent Rougon (Closes: #249673)
  * Fix Kiev summer traceback (fix by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov closes: #328098)
  * Improve CJK font performance (fix by Tomasz Wegrzanowski closes: #312379)
  * Remove example menu file and manpages from dh_make
  * Fix and use the doc-base example from dh_make
  * Clean up debian/rules
  * Remove install instructions from Docs/install.txt and install as README
    - Thanks to prec from #sed on freenode for the sed script to do this
  * Don't install README.txt
  * Install Docs/changes.txt as NEWS
  * Use dh_python and update debian/control to prepare for Python 2.4
  * chmod a+x the ttx.py script

Based on the following message I imagine you would not mind If I adopted
the package. Is this the case? If not, please check my diff.gz and
upload it to debian. If so, would you have time to sponsor future
uploads of fonttools? If so, excellent! If not, I should be able to find
one via sponsors.debian.net.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/03/msg00805.html

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: fonttools_1.99+2.0b1+cvs20050223-1.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to