Bug#329291: abstract family sockets are broken

2009-08-29 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:51:34PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > Even if it's supposed to support abstract AF_UNIX sockets, > > Socket::pack_sockaddr_un pads the structure with NULs, which makes the > > address different. > The fix was queued into Bleadperl, it's relatively small and safe; in >

Bug#329291: abstract family sockets are broken

2009-08-26 Thread Lubomir Rintel
Hi Marco, > Even if it's supposed to support abstract AF_UNIX sockets, > Socket::pack_sockaddr_un pads the structure with NULs, which makes the > address different. This probably describes the same issue as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=490660 The fix was queued into Bleadperl

Bug#329291: abstract family sockets are broken

2005-09-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: perl Version: 5.8.7-4 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Even if it's supposed to support abstract AF_UNIX sockets, Socket::pack_sockaddr_un pads the structure with NULs, which makes the address different. As you can see with strace: # right bind(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path=@/org/kernel/ude