Bug#329331: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#329331: Really???

2007-04-24 Thread Georg Baum
Am Montag 23 April 2007 22:32 schrieb Marco Herrn: Hi, On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 05:31:10PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: Since LyX 1.4.0 it is not possible anymore to omit the extension in LyX, so this bug is no longer applicable and should have been closed with the first 1.4.x release in

Bug#329331: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#329331: Really???

2007-04-22 Thread Sven Hoexter
package lyx tags 329331 -fixed-upstream thanks On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 05:31:10PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: Hi, Since LyX 1.4.0 it is not possible anymore to omit the extension in LyX, so this bug is no longer applicable and should have been closed with the first 1.4.x release in debian.

Bug#329331: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#329331: Really???

2007-04-22 Thread Georg Baum
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2007 18:11 schrieb Sven Hoexter: Sounds like the behaviour upstream prefers is the contradiction of what Marco would like to have. Is there a way we can agree to close this bug? Like a technical reason why it's not a good idea to implement the wished behaviour? I ask